Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A phase 2 trial of dasatinib in patients with locally advanced or stage IV mucosal, acral, or vulvovaginal melanoma: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E2607)

  • Kevin Kalinsky
  • , Sandra Lee
  • , Krista M. Rubin
  • , Donald P. Lawrence
  • , Anthony J. Iafrarte
  • , Darell R. Borger
  • , Kim A. Margolin
  • , Mario M. Leitao
  • , Ahmad A. Tarhini
  • , Henry B. Koon
  • , Andrew L. Pecora
  • , Anthony J. Jaslowski
  • , Gary I. Cohen
  • , Timothy M. Kuzel
  • , Christopher D. Lao
  • , John M. Kirkwood
  • Columbia University
  • Harvard University
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • City of Hope National Med Center
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • St. Vincent Hospital, Green Bay
  • Greater Baltimore Medical Center
  • Rush University
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

107 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: KIT-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib have demonstrated benefits in KIT-mutant (KIT+) mucosal, acral, vulvovaginal, and chronically sun-damaged (CSD) melanoma. Dasatinib has superior preclinical activity in comparison with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors against cells with the most common KIT mutation, exon 11L576P. The ECOG-ACRIN E2607 trial assessed dasatinib in patients with these melanoma subtypes. METHODS: Patients received 70 mg of oral dasatinib twice daily. The primary objective for this 2-stage phase 2 trial was response rate. Stage I was open to KIT+ and wild-type KIT (KIT–) mucosal, acral, and CSD melanoma (n = 57). Stage II accrued only KIT+ tumors (n = 30). To enrich the trial for KIT+ tumors, vulvovaginal melanoma was added, and CSD melanoma was removed from eligibility. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: From May 2009 to December 2010, the first stage enrolled 57 patients. Among the evaluable patients, 3 of 51 (5.9%) achieved a partial response: all were KIT–. Stage II closed early because of slow accrual (November 2011 to December 2015). In stage II, 4 of 22 evaluable patients (18.2%) had a partial response; the median duration was 4.2 months. The median PFS was 2.1 months (n = 73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.9 months). The median OS was 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.0-11.9 months). In exploratory analyses, no differences were seen in PFS or OS with the KIT status or subtype. Dasatinib was discontinued because of adverse events in 9 of 75 patients (12%). CONCLUSIONS: The dasatinib response rate among KIT+ melanoma patients was low. In view of its clinical activity, it is recommended that imatinib remain the KIT tyrosine kinase inhibitor of choice for unresectable KIT+ melanoma. Cancer 2017;123:2688-97.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2688-2697
Number of pages10
JournalCancer
Volume123
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Jul 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • acral
  • dasatinib
  • KIT mutation
  • melanoma
  • mucosal
  • vulvovaginal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A phase 2 trial of dasatinib in patients with locally advanced or stage IV mucosal, acral, or vulvovaginal melanoma: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E2607)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this