Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Phase i Study of an MPS1 Inhibitor (BAY 1217389) in Combination with Paclitaxel Using a Novel Randomized Continual Reassessment Method for Dose Escalation

  • Florence Atrafi
  • , Oliver Boix
  • , Vivek Subbiah
  • , Jennifer R. Diamond
  • , Sant P. Chawla
  • , Anthony W. Tolcher
  • , Patricia M. Lorusso
  • , Joseph P. Eder
  • , Martin Gutierrez
  • , Kumar Sankhala
  • , Prabhu Rajagopalan
  • , Isabelle Genvresse
  • , Simon Langer
  • , Ron H.J. Mathijssen
  • , Jaap Verweij
  • , Ingmar Bruns
  • , Martijn P. Lolkema
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Bayer AG
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
  • Sarcoma Oncology Center
  • South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics
  • Yale University
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • Chrestos Concept GmbH & Co. Kg

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Monopolar spindle 1 (MPS1) kinase inhibitor, BAY 1217389 (BAY) synergizes with paclitaxel. This phase I study assessed the combination of BAY with paclitaxel using a novel randomized continuous reassessment method (rCRM) to improve dose determination. Patients and Methods: Patients with solid tumors were randomized to receive oralBAY(twice daily 2-days-on/5-days-off) withweekly paclitaxel (90 mg/m2) or paclitaxel monotherapy in cycle 1. Dose escalation was guided by CRM modeling. Primary objectives were to assess safety, establish the MTD of BAY, and to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles for both compounds. Simulations were performed to determine the contribution of the rCRM for dose determination. Results: In total, 75 patients were enrolled. The main doselimiting toxicities were hematologic toxicities (55.6%). The MTD of BAY was established at 64 mg twice daily with paclitaxel. Inclusion of a control arm enabled the definitive attribution of grade ≥3 neutropenia to higher BAY exposure [AUC0-12 (P< 0.001)]. After determining the MTD, we included 19 patients with breast cancer at this dose for dose expansion. Other common toxicities were nausea (45.3%), fatigue (41.3%), and diarrhea (40.0%). Overall confirmed responses were seen in 31.6% of evaluable patients. Simulations showed that rCRM outperforms traditional designs in determining the true MTD. Conclusions: The combination of BAY with paclitaxel was associated with considerable toxicity without a therapeutic window. However, the use of the rCRM design enabled us to determine the exposure-toxicity relation for BAY. Therefore, we propose that the rCRM could improve dose determination in phase I trials that combine agents with overlapping toxicities. _2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6366-6375
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Volume27
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Phase i Study of an MPS1 Inhibitor (BAY 1217389) in Combination with Paclitaxel Using a Novel Randomized Continual Reassessment Method for Dose Escalation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this