Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Addressing disparities in lung cancer screening eligibility and healthcare access: An official American thoracic society statement

  • American Thoracic Society Assembly on Thoracic Oncology
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Vanderbilt University
  • The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • University of Kentucky
  • University of Washington
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • South Carolina State University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • American Cancer Society
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • VA Medical Center
  • Boston University
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

236 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: There are well-documented disparities in lung cancer outcomes across populations. Lung cancer screening (LCS) has the potential to reduce lung cancer mortality, but for this benefit to be realized by all high-risk groups, there must be careful attention to ensuring equitable access to this lifesaving preventive health measure. Objectives: To outline current knowledge on disparities in eligibility criteria for, access to, and implementation of LCS, and to develop an official American Thoracic Society statement to propose strategies to optimize current screening guidelines and resource allocation for equitable LCS implementation and dissemination. Methods: A multidisciplinary panel with expertise in LCS, implementation science, primary care, pulmonology, health behavior, smoking cessation, epidemiology, and disparities research was convened. Participants reviewed available literature on historical disparities in cancer screening and emerging evidence of disparities in LCS. Results: Existing LCS guidelines do not consider racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and sex-based differences in smoking behaviors or lung cancer risk. Multiple barriers, including access to screening and cost, further contribute to the inequities in implementation and dissemination of LCS. Conclusions: This statement identifies the impact of LCS eligibility criteria on vulnerable populations who are at increased risk of lung cancer but do not meet eligibility criteria for screening, as well as multiple barriers that contribute to disparities in LCS implementation. Strategies to improve the selection and dissemination of LCS in vulnerable groups are described.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E95-E112
JournalAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Volume202
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Barriers to lung cancer screening
  • Disparities in lung cancer screening
  • Lung cancer screening

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Addressing disparities in lung cancer screening eligibility and healthcare access: An official American thoracic society statement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this