Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assessment of energy density usage during 180W lithium triborate laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Is there an optimum amount of kilo-Joules per gram of prostate?

  • Roger Valdivieso
  • , Christian P. Meyer
  • , Pierre Alain Hueber
  • , Malek Meskawi
  • , Abdullah M. Alenizi
  • , Mounsif Azizi
  • , Quoc Dien Trinh
  • , Vincent Misrai
  • , Matthew Rutman
  • , Alexis E. Te
  • , Bilal Chughtai
  • , Neil J. Barber
  • , Amr M. Emara
  • , Ravi Munver
  • , Kevin C. Zorn
  • Centre Hospitalier de L'Universite de Montreal
  • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Clinique Pasteur Toulouse
  • Columbia University
  • Cornell University
  • Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effect of energy density (kJ/mL) applied on adenoma during photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) treatment for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) on functional outcomes, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction and complications. Patients and Methods: After exclusions, a total of 440 patients who underwent GreenLight tm laser XPS-180W lithium triborate PVP for the treatment of BPH were retrospectively reviewed. Data were collected from seven different international centres (Canada, USA, UK and France). Patients were stratified into four energy density groups (kJ/mL) according to intra-operative energy delivered and prostate volume as determined by preoperative transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS): group 1: <3 kJ/mL; group 2: 3–5 kJ/mL; group 3: 5–7 kJ/mL; and group 4: ≥7 kJ/mL. Energy density groups were chosen arbitrarily. PSA reduction and functional outcomes (International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, post-void residual urine volume, maximum urinary flow rate) were compared at 6, 12 and 24 months. Peri-operative complications and retreatment rates were also compared among the groups. Results: The PSA reduction rates at 24 months after the procedure were 51, 61, 79 and 83% for the energy density groups <3, 3–5, 5–7 and ≥7 kJ/mL, respectively (P ≤ 0.01). This held true after accounting for baseline confounders. Energy density was not associated with higher complication rates, including haematuria, stricture formation, incontinence, refractory urinary retention, urinary tract infection and conversion to transurethral resection of the prostate. Functional outcomes at 2 years of follow-up were equivalent among the groups (P > 0.05 for all) and similar retreatment rates were observed (P = 0.36). Conclusion: Higher energy usage per cc of prostate was associated with a more significant reduction in PSA level (>50%) at 6, 12 and 24 months, suggesting increased vaporization of adenoma tissue; however, this did not translate into differences in functional outcomes at 2-year follow-up.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)633-640
Number of pages8
JournalBJU International
Volume118
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2016

Keywords

  • GreenLight
  • benign prostate hyperplasia
  • energy
  • lithium triborate
  • photoselective vaporization
  • prostate-specific antigen reduction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of energy density usage during 180W lithium triborate laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Is there an optimum amount of kilo-Joules per gram of prostate?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this