Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Burkitt Lymphoma International Prognostic Index

  • The Burkitt Lymphoma International Prognostic Index Consortium
  • Brown University
  • Aalborg University
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • Emory University
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • City of Hope National Med Center
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
  • New York University
  • Lund University
  • Ohio State University
  • University of Iowa
  • University of British Columbia
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
  • Northwestern University
  • King's College Hospital
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • Tufts Medical Center
  • University of Miami
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Barts Health NHS Trust
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Thomas Jefferson University
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
  • University of Manchester
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • University of Virginia
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
  • University of Oslo
  • Loyola University Medical Center
  • University of Washington
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

83 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE Burkitt lymphoma (BL) has unique biology and clinical course but lacks a standardized prognostic model. We developed and validated a novel prognostic index specific for BL to aid risk stratification, interpretation of clinical trials, and targeted development of novel treatment approaches. METHODS We derived the BL International Prognostic Index (BL-IPI) from a real-world data set of adult patients with BL treated with immunochemotherapy in the United States between 2009 and 2018, identifying candidate variables that showed the strongest prognostic association with progression-free survival (PFS). The index was validated in an external data set of patients treated in Europe, Canada, and Australia between 2004 and 2019. RESULTS In the derivation cohort of 633 patients with BL, age $ 40 years, performance status $ 2, serum lactate dehydrogenase . 33 upper limit of normal, and CNS involvement were selected as equally weighted factors with an independent prognostic value. The resulting BL-IPI identified groups with low (zero risk factors, 18% of patients), intermediate (one factor, 36% of patients), and high risk ($ 2 factors, 46% of patients) with 3-year PFS estimates of 92%, 72%, and 53%, respectively, and 3-year overall survival estimates of 96%, 76%, and 59%, respectively. The index discriminated outcomes regardless of HIV status, stage, or first-line chemotherapy regimen. Patient characteristics, relative size of the BL-IPI groupings, and outcome discrimination were consistent in the validation cohort of 457 patients, with 3-year PFS estimates of 96%, 82%, and 63% for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk BL-IPI, respectively. CONCLUSION The BL-IPI provides robust discrimination of survival in adult BL, suitable for use as prognostication and stratification in trials. The high-risk group has suboptimal outcomes with standard therapy and should be considered for innovative treatment approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1129-1138
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume39
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Burkitt Lymphoma International Prognostic Index'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this