Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cancer-related cognitive outcomes among older breast cancer survivors in the thinking and living with cancer study

  • Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
  • , Brent J. Small
  • , Gheorghe Luta
  • , Arti Hurria
  • , Heather Jim
  • , Brenna C. McDonald
  • , Deena Graham
  • , Xingtao Zhou
  • , Jonathan Clapp
  • , Wanting Zhai
  • , Elizabeth Breen
  • , Judith E. Carroll
  • , Neelima Denduluri
  • , Asma Dilawari
  • , Martine Extermann
  • , Claudine Isaacs
  • , Paul B. Jacobsen
  • , Lindsay C. Kobayashi
  • , Kelly Holohan Nudelman
  • , James Root
  • Robert A. Stern, Danielle Tometich, Raymond Turner, John W. VanMeter, Andrew J. Saykin, Tim Ahles
  • Georgetown University
  • Moffitt Cancer Center
  • City of Hope National Med Center
  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • US Oncology Network
  • Washington Hospital Center
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Cornell University
  • Boston University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

161 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose To determine treatment and aging-related effects on longitudinal cognitive function in older breast cancer survivors. Methods Newly diagnosed nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors (n = 344) and matched controls without cancer (n = 347) 60 years of age and older without dementia or neurologic disease were recruited between August 2010 and December 2015. Data collection occurred during presystemic treatment/ control enrollment and at 12 and 24 months through biospecimens; surveys; self-reported Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function; and neuropsychological tests that measured attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE) and learning and memory (LM). Linear mixed-effects models tested two-way interactions of treatment group (control, chemotherapy with or without hormonal therapy, and hormonal therapy) and time and explored three-way interactions of ApoE (e4+ v not) by group by time; covariates included baseline age, frailty, race, and cognitive reserve. Results Survivors and controls were 60 to 98 years of age, were well educated, and had similar baseline cognitive scores. Treatment was related to longitudinal cognition scores, with survivors who received chemotherapy having increasingly worse APE scores (P = .05) and those initiating hormonal therapy having lower LM scores at 12 months (P = .03) than other groups. These group-by-time differences varied by ApoE genotype, where only e4+ survivors receiving hormone therapy had short-term decreases in adjusted LM scores (three-way interaction P = .03). For APE, the three-way interaction was not significant (P = .14), but scores were significantly lower for e4+ survivors exposed to chemotherapy (20.40; 95% CI, 20.79 to 20.01) at 24 months than e4+ controls (0.01; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.18; P, .05). Increasing age was associated with lower baseline scores on all cognitive measures (P, .001); frailty was associated with baseline APE and self-reported decline (P, .001). Conclusion Breast cancer systemic treatment and aging-related phenotypes and genotypes are associated with longitudinal decreases in cognitive function scores in older survivors. These data could inform treatment decision making and survivorship care planning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3211-3222
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume36
Issue number32
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 Nov 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cancer-related cognitive outcomes among older breast cancer survivors in the thinking and living with cancer study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this