Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs lenalidomide- dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma by previous treatment

  • M. A. Dimopoulos
  • , A. K. Stewart
  • , T. Masszi
  • , I. Spicka
  • , A. Oriol
  • , R. Hájek
  • , L. Rosiñol
  • , D. Siegel
  • , G. G. Mihaylov
  • , V. Goranova-Marinova
  • , P. Rajnics
  • , A. Suvorov
  • , R. Niesvizky
  • , A. Jakubowiak
  • , J. San-Miguel
  • , H. Ludwig
  • , S. Ro
  • , S. Aggarwal
  • , P. Moreau
  • , A. Palumbo
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
  • Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, AZ
  • Semmelweis University
  • Charles University
  • Generalitat de Catalunya
  • University of Ostrava
  • University Hospital Clinic
  • Medical University Sofia
  • Medical University of Plovdiv
  • Mór Kaposi Teaching Hospital
  • First Republican Clinical Hospital
  • Cornell University
  • The University of Chicago
  • University of Navarra
  • Klinik Ottakring
  • Onyx Pharmaceuticals
  • Nantes Université
  • University of Turin

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

62 Scopus citations

Abstract

Carfilzomib, a proteasome inhibitor, is approved as monotherapy and in combination with dexamethasone or lenalidomide- dexamethasone (Rd) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. The approval of carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) was based on results from the randomized, phase 3 study ASPIRE (NCT01080391), which showed KRd significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs Rd (median 26.3 vs 17.6 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.690; P = 0.0001). This subgroup analysis of ASPIRE evaluated KRd vs Rd by number of previous lines of therapy and previous exposure to bortezomib, thalidomide or lenalidomide. Treatment with KRd led to a 12-month improvement in median PFS vs Rd after first relapse (HR 0.713) and a 9-month improvement after 2 previous lines of therapy (HR 0.720). Treatment with KRd led to an approximate 8-month improvement vs Rd in median PFS in bortezomib-exposed patients (HR 0.699), a 15-month improvement in thalidomide-exposed patients (HR 0.587) and a 5-month improvement in lenalidomideexposed patients (HR 0.796). Objective response and complete response or better rates were higher with KRd vs Rd, irrespective of previous treatment. KRd had a favorable benefit-risk profile and should be considered an appropriate treatment option for patients with 1 or 2 previous lines of therapy and those previously exposed to bortezomib, thalidomide or lenalidomide.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere554
JournalBlood Cancer Journal
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs lenalidomide- dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma by previous treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this