Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical experience with percutaneous left ventricular transapical access for interventions in structural heart defects: A safe access and secure exit

  • Vladimir Jelnin
  • , Yuriy Dudiy
  • , Bryce N. Einhorn
  • , Itzhak Kronzon
  • , Howard A. Cohen
  • , Carlos E. Ruiz
  • Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute of New York

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

105 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the safety of percutaneous direct left ventricular access for interventional procedures. Background: Experience with percutaneous access of the left ventricle (LV) for interventional procedures has been limited and associated with a high percentage of major complications. We report our clinical experience with percutaneous direct LV access for interventional procedures. Methods: Between March 2008 and December 2010, there were 32 percutaneous transapical punctures in 28 consecutive patients (16 males, mean age 68.2 ± 10.8 years). The delivery sheath sizes ranged from 5- to 12-F. Results: All transapical punctures were successfully performed, and safe closure of the access sites was achieved. Total procedural time was 153.6 ± 49.4 min for procedures converted from conventional approaches to a transapical approach, 129.5 ± 29.6 min for the transapical approach with trans-septal rail support, and 109.3 ± 41.4 min for the planned transapical approach. Fluoroscopy time was 61.3 ± 26.1 min, 29.7 ± 20.8 min, and 27.4 ± 21.4 min, respectively. Fluoroscopy time for closure of mitral paravalvular leaks was reduced by 35%, from 42.6 ± 29.9 min to 27.4 ± 15.6 min. Complications were observed in 2 patients (7.1%). Conclusions: With meticulous planning, transapical puncture is safe. The transapical access provides a more direct approach to the LV targets for intervention and leads to a significant decrease in the procedural and fluoroscopy times. Device closure of the direct LV access site is a reliable and safe method of hemostasis. Placement of a closure device should be considered if sheaths larger than 5-F are used. Although we used this technique only for paravalvular leak and LV pseudoaneurysm closure, it may have application for other percutaneous structural heart interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)868-874
Number of pages7
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume4
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2011

Keywords

  • direct LV puncture
  • percutaneous interventions
  • transapical access
  • transthoracic access

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical experience with percutaneous left ventricular transapical access for interventions in structural heart defects: A safe access and secure exit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this