Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Unique Cohorts Underrepresented in Clinical Trials

  • Neil J. Shah
  • , Alexandra Della Pia
  • , Tianmin Wu
  • , Aquino Williams
  • , Melinda Weber
  • , Brittany Sinclaire
  • , Elli Gourna Paleoudis
  • , Adil Alaoui
  • , Shaked Lev-Ari
  • , Shari Adams
  • , Jordan Kaufman
  • , Sahil B. Parikh
  • , Emily Tonti
  • , Eric Muller
  • , Michael Serzan
  • , Divya Cheruku
  • , Albert Lee
  • , Aishwarya Sridhar
  • , Benjamin (Thor) Perrin Hee
  • , Jaeil Ahn
  • Andrew Pecora, Andrew Ip, Michael B. Atkins
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital
  • Hackensack Meridian Health
  • Georgetown University
  • Hackensack Meridian Health Mountainside Medical Center
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Regulatory approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was based on results of large, randomized clinical trials, resulting in limited outcomes data in patient cohorts typically underrepresented in such trials. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICIs in these unique patient cohorts. This is a multicenter, retrospective analysis of real-world data at six academic and community clinics in the United States from 1 January 2011 to 1 April 2018. Patients were included if they had received at least one cycle of ICI treatment. Unique patient cohorts included age > 75 years, non-White race, positive smoking history, ECOG performance status (PS) ≥ 2, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, autoimmune diseases (AIDs), chronic viral infections (CVI), extensive prior lines of therapy (LOTs), or >three metastatic sites. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs), overall survival (OS), and time to treatment failure were evaluated in the entire cohort and in NSCLC patients treated with PD-(L)1 monotherapy. Outcomes and their association with unique patient cohorts were compared on univariate analysis and multivariate analysis to those without a particular characteristic in the entire NSCLC PD-(L)1 monotherapy cohorts. In total, 1453 patients were included: 56.5%—smokers, 30.4%—non-White, 22.8%—elderly, 20.8%—ECOG PS ≥ 2, 15.7%—history of AIDs, and 4.7%—history of CVI. The common ICIs were nivolumab (37.1%) and pembrolizumab (22.2%). Black patients, compared to White patients, experienced fewer irAEs (OR 0.54, p < 0.001). An ECOG PS of ≥2 (HR = 2.01, p < 0.001) and an increased number of previous LOTs were associated with poor OS (the median OS of 26.2 vs. 16.2 vs. 9.6 months for one vs. two vs. three prior LOTs, p < 0.001). The above results were confirmed in anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy non-small cell lung cancer patients (n = 384). Overall, ICIs were safe and efficacious in these typically underrepresented patient cohorts. We noted ECOG PS ≥ 2 and an increased prior LOTs were associated with poor ICI efficacy, and Black patients, compared to White patients, experienced fewer irAEs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2223
JournalCancers
Volume16
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)
  • immune-related adverse events (irAEs)
  • nivolumab
  • non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  • pembrolizumab

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Unique Cohorts Underrepresented in Clinical Trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this