Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinicopathologic consensus study of gray zone lymphoma with features intermediate between DLBCL and classical HL

  • Monika Pilichowska
  • , Stefania Pittaluga
  • , Judith A. Ferry
  • , Jessica Hemminger
  • , Hong Chang
  • , Jennifer A. Kanakry
  • , Laurie H. Sehn
  • , Tatyana Feldman
  • , Jeremy S. Abramson
  • , Athena Kritharis
  • , Francisco J. Hernandez-Ilizaliturri
  • , Izidore S. Lossos
  • , Oliver W. Press
  • , Timothy S. Fenske
  • , Jonathan W. Friedberg
  • , Julie M. Vose
  • , Kristie A. Blum
  • , Deepa Jagadeesh
  • , Bruce Woda
  • , Gaurav K. Gupta
  • Randy D. Gascoyne, Elaine S. Jaffe, Andrew M. Evens
  • Tufts Medical Center
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Ohio State University
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Provincial Health Services Authority
  • Center for Regenerative Medicine
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  • University of Miami
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • University of Rochester
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • University of Massachusetts Medical School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

79 Scopus citations

Abstract

Gray zone lymphoma (GZL) is described as sharing featureswith classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, there remains complexity in establishing diagnosis, delineating prognosis, and determining optimum therapy. Sixty-eight cases diagnosed as GZL across 15 NorthAmerican academic centerswere evaluated by central pathology review to achieve consensus. Of these, only 26 (38%) were confirmed as GZL. Morphology was critical to GZL consensus diagnosis (eg, tumor cell richness); immunohistochemistry showed universalB-cellderivation, frequent CD30 expression, and rare Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity (CD20+, 83%; PAX5+, 100%; BCL6+, 20%; MUM1+, 100%; CD30+, 92%; EBV+, 4%). Forty-two cases were reclassified: nodular sclerosis (NS) cHL, n = 27 (including n = 10 NS grade 2); lymphocyte predominant HL, n = 4; DLBCL, n = 4; EBV1 DLBCL, n=3; primary mediastinal large BCL n = 2; lymphocyte-rich cHL and BCL-not otherwise specified, n=1 each. GZL consensus-confirmed vs reclassified cases, respectively, more often had mediastinal disease (69% vs 41%; P=.038) and less likely more than 1 extranodal site (0%vs 25%; P5.019).With a 44-monthmedian follow-up, 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival for patients with confirmed GZL were 39% and 95%, respectively, vs 58% and 85%, respectively, for reclassified cases (P=.19 and P=.15, respectively). Interestingly, NS grade 2 reclassified patients had similar PFS as GZL consensus-confirmed cases. For prognostication of GZL cases, hypoalbuminemia was a negative factor (3-year PFS, 12% vs 64%; P=.01), whereas frontline cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone ± rituximab (CHOP6R) was associated with improved 3-year PFS (70% vs 20%; P=.03); both factors remained significant on multivariate analysis. Altogether, accurate diagnosis of GZL remains challenging, and improved therapeutic strategies are needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2600-2609
Number of pages10
JournalBlood Advances
Volume1
Issue number26
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinicopathologic consensus study of gray zone lymphoma with features intermediate between DLBCL and classical HL'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this