Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of Twin and Autologous Transplants for Multiple Myeloma

  • Asad Bashey
  • , Waleska S. Pérez
  • , Mei Jie Zhang
  • , Kenneth C. Anderson
  • , Karen Ballen
  • , James R. Berenson
  • , L. Bik To
  • , Rafael Fonseca
  • , César O. Freytes
  • , Robert Peter Gale
  • , John Gibson
  • , Sergio A. Giralt
  • , Robert A. Kyle
  • , Hillard M. Lazarus
  • , Dipnarine Maharaj
  • , Philip L. McCarthy
  • , Gustavo A. Milone
  • , Stephen Nimer
  • , Santiago Pavlovsky
  • , Donna E. Reece
  • Gary Schiller, David H. Vesole, Parameswaran Hari
  • BMT Group of Georgia
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Institute for Myeloma Bone Cancer Research
  • Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science Australia
  • Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, AZ
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
  • Celgene Corporation
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • South Florida Bone Marrow Stem Cell Transplant Institute
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  • Fundaleu
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Princess Margaret Hospital
  • University of California at Los Angeles

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Relapse is the overwhelming cause of treatment failure after autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma (MM). For patients with a syngeneic donor, twin transplants provide a healthy graft that is free of myeloma. The relative impact of the graft on posttransplant relapse can be estimated by comparing risk of relapse after hematopoietic cell transplantation from genetically identical twins versus autotransplants because confounding differences in minor or major histocompatibility antigens are absent in the syngeneic transplant setting. Outcomes of 43 subjects who received twin transplants for MM were compared to 170 matched autotransplant recipients reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). Multivariate analysis was performed by fitting a Cox model stratified on matched pairs. The matched transplant patients studied were similar with respect to subject-, disease-, and transplant-related characteristics. Cumulative incidence of relapse/progression was significantly lower, and progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly higher following twin transplants. In multivariate analysis, the probability of relapse/progression was lower in twins (relative risk [RR] = 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.86, P = .011). Twin transplants have a significantly lower relapse risk than autotransplants in MM, suggesting that graft composition may impact outcomes following high-dose chemotherapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1118-1124
Number of pages7
JournalBiology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Volume14
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2008

Keywords

  • Autotransplant
  • Graft-versus-myeloma
  • Multiple myeloma
  • Twin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Twin and Autologous Transplants for Multiple Myeloma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this