Corrigendum to “Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention and the clinical effectiveness debate: Is newer always better? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis” (Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, (2025), 76, C, (113-120), (S1553838925001563), 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.04.005)

The authors regret that in the originally published version of this article, the Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted Technologies in the Writing Process was inadvertently omitted. This oversight has now been corrected, and the declaration has been included. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. During the preparation of this work, the authors used Gemini (Google Inc.) during writing, translating, and grammar checking process. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article. A large language model was not used for data extraction, screening, or statistical analysis. All ideas, analysis, and final content were produced and approved by the authors.