Abstract
Contemporary total knee designs incorporating highly porous metallic surfaces have demonstrated promising clinical outcomes. However, stiffness differences between modular and monoblock porous tantalum tibial trays may affect bone ingrowth. This study investigated effect of implant design, spatial location and clinical factors on bone ingrowth. Three modular and twenty-one monoblock retrieved porous tantalum tibial trays were evaluated for bone ingrowth. Nonparametric statistical tests were used to investigate differences in bone ingrowth by implant design, tray spatial location, substrate depth and clinical factors. Modular trays (5.3±3.2%) exhibited higher bone ingrowth than monoblock trays (1.6±1.9%, P=0.032). Bone ingrowth in both designs was highest in the initial 500μm from the surface. Implantation time was positively correlated with bone ingrowth for monoblock trays.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1073-1078 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Arthroplasty |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jun 2015 |
Keywords
- Aseptic loosening
- Bone ingrowth
- Porous tantalum
- Porous tantalum tibial trays
- Tibial tray design
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is There A Difference in Bone Ingrowth in Modular Versus Monoblock Porous Tantalum Tibial Trays?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver