Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is There A Difference in Bone Ingrowth in Modular Versus Monoblock Porous Tantalum Tibial Trays?

  • Ingrowth retrieval study group
  • Implant Research Center
  • Drexel University
  • Exponent, Inc.
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Hartzband Center for Hip and Knee Replacement
  • Rothman Orthopaedic Institute

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Contemporary total knee designs incorporating highly porous metallic surfaces have demonstrated promising clinical outcomes. However, stiffness differences between modular and monoblock porous tantalum tibial trays may affect bone ingrowth. This study investigated effect of implant design, spatial location and clinical factors on bone ingrowth. Three modular and twenty-one monoblock retrieved porous tantalum tibial trays were evaluated for bone ingrowth. Nonparametric statistical tests were used to investigate differences in bone ingrowth by implant design, tray spatial location, substrate depth and clinical factors. Modular trays (5.3±3.2%) exhibited higher bone ingrowth than monoblock trays (1.6±1.9%, P=0.032). Bone ingrowth in both designs was highest in the initial 500μm from the surface. Implantation time was positively correlated with bone ingrowth for monoblock trays.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1073-1078
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume30
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2015

Keywords

  • Aseptic loosening
  • Bone ingrowth
  • Porous tantalum
  • Porous tantalum tibial trays
  • Tibial tray design

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is There A Difference in Bone Ingrowth in Modular Versus Monoblock Porous Tantalum Tibial Trays?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this