Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mechanical circulatory support in high-risk elective PCI: rationale and design of the PROTECT IV trial

  • Norman Mangner
  • , Samin K. Sharma
  • , Chris O’connor
  • , Amir Kaki
  • , George D. Dangas
  • , Jeffrey W. Moses
  • , Ehtisham Mahmud
  • , Giuseppe Tarantini
  • , Stephan Achenbach
  • , Stuart J. Pocock
  • , William W. O’neill
  • , Cindy L. Grines
  • , Alexandra J. Lansky
  • , Jason R. Wollmuth
  • , Jagat Narula
  • , Dimitrios I. Karmpaliotis
  • , Haroon A. Faraz
  • , Mir B. Mir
  • , Aditya S. Bharadwaj
  • , Ziad A. Ali
  • Chuck Simonton, Seth D. Bilazarian, Navin K. Kapur, Roberta C. Chapman, Dana Bentley, Jeffrey J. Popma, Akiko Maehara, Stephan Windecker, Gregg W. Stone
  • Technische Universität Dresden
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Inova Heart and Vascular Institute
  • St. John Health System
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • Cardiovascular Research Foundation
  • Columbia University
  • St. Francis Heart Center
  • University of California at San Diego
  • University of Padua
  • Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Henry Ford Health System
  • Northside Hospital
  • Yale New Haven Health System
  • Providence Heart Institute
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • Morristown Medical Center
  • Loma Linda University Health
  • St. Francis Hospital
  • Abiomed
  • University of Bern

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improves long-term mortality in HFrEF. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often performed as an alternative to CABG in patients at high surgical risk. However, in patients with HFrEF and limited myocardial reserve, PCI may result in haemodynamic instability, increasing risk and precluding optimal revascularisation. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) during high-risk PCI may enhance haemodynamic stability during the procedure and enable complete revascularisation. We thus performed the PROTECT IV trial to determine whether PCI with routine use of the Impella CP microaxial flow pump improves early and late outcomes in patients with HFrEF and complex CAD compared with PCI with or without use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). PROTECT IV is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, parallel-controlled, open-label, superiority trial with an adaptive design. Patients with complex CAD and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% (n=1,252) deemed at excessive surgical risk for bypass grafting by the Heart Team will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to PCI with Impella CP versus PCI with or without an IABP. The primary endpoint is the composite of all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, unplanned clinically driven revascularisation, durable left ventricular assist device implant or heart transplant, or other hospitalisation for cardiovascular causes at 3-year follow-up, with at least 1-year follow-up in all patients. Prespecified substudies will evaluate the impact of MCS on renal function, the procedural role of right heart catheterisation, and the utility of myocardial viability assessment. The PROTECT IV trial will determine whether routine MCS with Impella CP during high-risk PCI improves the prognosis of patients with complex CAD and HFrEF.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1244-1258
Number of pages15
JournalEuroIntervention
Volume21
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

Keywords

  • HFrEF
  • Impella
  • high-risk PCI
  • microaxial flow pump
  • prognosis
  • randomised controlled trial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanical circulatory support in high-risk elective PCI: rationale and design of the PROTECT IV trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this