Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Open versus endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

  • George Dangas
  • , David O'Connor
  • , Belal Firwana
  • , Somjot Brar
  • , Sharif Ellozy
  • , Angeliki Vouyouka
  • , Margaret Arnold
  • , Constantine E. Kosmas
  • , Prakash Krishnan
  • , Jose Wiley
  • , Javed Suleman
  • , Jeffrey Olin
  • , Michael Marin
  • , Peter Faries
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Kaiser Permanente

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

113 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the short-, intermediate-, and longer-term outcomes after endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), including both AAA-related and all-cause mortality. Background: Endovascular stent graft placement for AAA has gained broad acceptance as an alternative to open surgical repair due to a lower perioperative morbidity and mortality. The intermediate- and long-term all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality vary among studies. Thus, we sought to perform a meta-analysis of open versus endovascular repair for treating AAA. Methods: Electronic databases were queried for identification of prospective, randomized trials of open surgery versus endovascular stent graft repair of AAA. A total of 10 published papers reporting on 6 studies at different follow-up intervals were identified; they involved 2,899 patients with AAA repair procedures, of whom, 1,470 underwent endovascular stent graft AAA exclusion and 1,429 were treated by open AAA repair. Results: At 30 days, the pooled relative risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the endovascular group (relative risk [RR]: 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19 to 0.64) than in the open surgery group. At intermediate follow-up, the all-cause mortality had a nonsignificant difference (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.57 to 1.08), the AAA-related mortality was significantly lower (RR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.74) and reintervention rates were higher (RR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.08) in the endovascular group than in the open surgery group. At long-term follow-up, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.15) or AAA-related mortality (RR: 1.58, 95% CI: 0.20 to 12.74), whereas the significant difference in the rate of reinterventions persisted (RR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.58 to 4.08). Conclusions: In patients randomized to open or endovascular AAA repair, all-cause perioperative mortality, as well as AAA-related mortality at short- and intermediate-term follow-up are lower in patients undergoing endovascular stent graft placement. This was associated with greater reintervention in the endovascular group noted at intermediate follow-up. Long-term survival appears to converge between the 2 groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1071-1080
Number of pages10
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume5
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012

Keywords

  • abdominal aortic aneurysm
  • aortic aneurysm
  • endovascular procedure
  • general surgery
  • vascular disease
  • vascular surgical procedures

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Open versus endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A meta-analysis of randomized trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this