Abstract
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) defines engagement in research as the meaningful involvement of patients, caregivers, clinicians, insurers, and others throughout the entire research process—from planning to conducting the study to disseminating study results. The purposes of this paper are to (a) describe methods used to engage community members across the various phases of a PCORI-funded comparative effectiveness trial to increase colorectal cancer screening; and (b) report results of qualitative and quantitative evaluations of community advisory board members’ experiences on this project. Decisions to join and stay engaged with the study included feeling valued and appreciated, being compensated, the opportunity to contribute to research based on their skills and expertise, and being committed to colon cancer prevention efforts. Challenges identified by advisory board members included the significant time commitment, transportation, and meeting location. Lessons learned and guidance for researchers committed to patient and community engagement are described.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 930-938 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Western Journal of Nursing Research |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- community advisory board
- community engagement
- comparative effectiveness trial
- evaluation
- patient engagement
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Partnering to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening: Perspectives of Community Advisory Board Members'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver