Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prospective Randomized Study of Mode Switching in a Clinical Trial of Pacemaker Therapy for Sinus Node Dysfunction

  • Michael O. Sweeney
  • , Anne S. Hellkamp
  • , Kenneth A. Ellenbogen
  • , Taya V. Glotzer
  • , Russell Silverman
  • , Raymond Yee
  • , Kerry L. Lee
  • , Gervasio A. Lamas
  • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Duke University
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • Northeast Medical Center
  • Western University
  • Mount Sinai Medical Center Miami Beach

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in pacemaker patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) and may result in rapid ventricular pacing (RVP) in the DDDR mode. Mode switching (MS) reduces RVP, but its clinical benefit in patients with SND is unknown. Methods and Results: Two hundred two patients in the Mode Selection Trial (MOST; 2,010-patient, 6-year trial of DDDR vs VVIR pacing in SND) randomized to DDDR pacemakers with atrial high-rate episode (AHRE) storage capabilities were subrandomized to MS ON (N = 96) or MS OFF (N = 106). Cardiovascular symptoms, quality of life (QOL), reprogramming due to RVP, death, stroke, and heart failure hospitalization (HFH) were compared between groups. The treatment groups were similar with regard to AF history (59% MS ON vs 57% MS OFF). AHREs occurred in 49% patients during median follow-up of 2.2 years. Median AHRE duration (in min; MS ON 116 vs MS OFF 58, P = 0.29), frequency AHREs/week (MS ON 3.5 vs MS OFF 6.4, P = 0.23), and time spent in AHRE (min/week) (MS ON 450, MS OFF 268) were similar. Reprogramming due to any RVP during AHREs occurred more in MS OFF vs MS ON (13.2% vs 3.1%, P = 0.011) and marginally more for symptomatic RVP (8.5% vs 2.1%, P = 0.062). Cardiovascular symptoms occurred in 93.6% MS ON vs 90.2% MS OFF (P = 0.38). Median number of symptoms reported per visit was similar (MS ON 1.3 vs MS OFF 1.5, P = 0.62). Median symptom frequency/severity, summed and averaged over visits, was similar (MS ON 4.3 vs MS OFF 4.5, P = 0.74). QOL was not different between groups. Death, stroke, and HFH were not different between groups. Conclusion: MS reduces pacemaker reprogramming due to RVP during AHREs in a small number of patients but does not improve QOL or cardiovascular symptoms overall among patients with SND.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-160
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2004

Keywords

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Pacing
  • Sinus node dysfunction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective Randomized Study of Mode Switching in a Clinical Trial of Pacemaker Therapy for Sinus Node Dysfunction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this