Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Transcatheter Left Ventricular Restoration in Ischemic Heart Failure and Dilated Cardiomyopathy

  • Muhammad Mohid Haroon
  • , Faizan Ahmad
  • , Ramsha Ali
  • , Saqlain Haider
  • , Areehah Zafar Masood
  • , Usama Yaseen
  • , Taha Ahmad Zaka Ur Rehman
  • , Muhammad Abdullah Sardar
  • , Muhammad Umer
  • , Shruthi Aswathappa
  • , Muhammad Salman Sabri
  • , Muhammad Muneeb Murtaza
  • , Rubiya Ali
  • , Sunny Kumar
  • , Sameer Ali
  • , Najam Gohar
  • , Mohamed Bakr
  • , Swapnil Patel
  • , Mohammad A. Hussain
  • , Fawaz Alenezi
  • Lahore General Hospital
  • Hackensack Meridian Health
  • Peoples University of Medical & Health Science for Women
  • Ziauddin Medical College
  • University of Oklahoma
  • King Edward Medical University Lahore
  • M S Ramaiah Medical College
  • Thomas Jefferson University
  • Memorial Regional Hospital
  • Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education
  • Desert Valley Hospital
  • Duke University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Ischemic heart disease is the leading global cause of death and frequently progresses to ischemic heart failure (IHF) after myocardial infarction through adverse left ventricular (LV)remodeling. Surgical LV restoration improves ventricular geometry and function but is limited by invasiveness and inconsistent outcomes. Transcatheter Left Ventricular Restoration (TLVR) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative,employing devices such as Revivent TC, AccuCinch, and Parachute to reduce LV volume, wall stress, and improve LV ejection fraction (LVEF). While several studies have reported promising results, no prior meta-analysis has synthesized the evidence across devices. This meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched through July 2025. Eligible studies included adult patients with IHF or dilated cardiomyopathy undergoing TLVR and reporting outcomes including LVEF, LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, or Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Single-arm interventional and observational cohort studies were included. Data extraction was performed by four reviewers, with bias assessed using ROBINS-I and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Pooled mean differences (MD) were calculated using a random-effects model (Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman). Seventeen studies were included, with baseline LVEF 22.8%–38% and LVEDV 75–235 mL. TLVR significantly reduced LVEDV (MD −25.94 mL; p < 0.00001), increased LVEF (+6.69%; p < 0.00001), and improved the NYHA class (MD −0.73; p = 0.02). KCCQ scores improved in some studies but were not significant overall. Revivent TC and AccuCinch showed consistent benefits, whereas Parachute outcomes were more variable. This meta-analysis of TLVR demonstrates consistent improvements in LV remodeling, function, and symptoms. Nonetheless, high heterogeneity, small cohorts, and limited follow-up highlight the need for large randomized trials to establish durability, survival benefit, and refine patient selection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)898-908
Number of pages11
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume107
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2026

Keywords

  • Ischemic heart failure
  • dilated cardiomyopathy
  • left ventricular remodeling
  • minimally invasive therapy
  • transcatheter left ventricular restoration
  • ventricular function

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transcatheter Left Ventricular Restoration in Ischemic Heart Failure and Dilated Cardiomyopathy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this