Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Trends in Atrial Fibrillation and Ablation Therapy During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

  • Anmol Johal
  • , Joseph Heaton
  • , Abbas Alshami
  • , Ndausung Udongwo
  • , Steven Imburgio
  • , Anton Mararenko
  • , Brett Sealove
  • , Jesus Almendral
  • , Jeffrey Selan
  • , Riple Hansalia
  • Jersey Shore University Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected many aspects of health care and continues to have an impact as waves of COVID-19 cases re-emerge. Many procedures were negatively impacted by the pandemic, and management was primarily focused on limiting exposure to the virus. We present an analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to delineate how COVID-19 affected atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The NIS was analyzed from 2017–2020 in order to determine the pre- and intra-pandemic impacts on AF ablation procedures. Admissions were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes with a primary diagnosis of AF (ICD-10 CM code I48.0, I48.1, I48.2, or I48.91). Admissions were also assessed for the use of cardiac ablation therapy. Comorbidity diagnoses were identified using the Elixhauser comorbidity software (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Rockville, MD, USA); additional ICD-10 codes for diagnoses and procedures used are also provided. The primary outcome of our study was the trend in ablation therapy during AF admissions. Secondary outcomes included health care disparities, inpatient mortality, and length of stay. Ablation therapy was used in 18,885 admissions in 2020, compared to the preceding 3-year average of 20,103 (adjusted Wald test, P = .002). Multivariate logistic regression revealed a greater likelihood of undergoing ablation therapy (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.10–1.40; P < .001) among 2020 admissions compared to 2017 admissions. Inpatient mortality increased in 2020 compared to the preceding average; however, the difference was not significant. The procedural volume of ablation for AF saw a decrease in 2020; however, surprisingly, more patients were likely to undergo ablation during 2020.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5955-5962
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management
Volume15
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2024

Keywords

  • Ablation
  • COVID-19
  • arrhythmia
  • atrial fibrillation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trends in Atrial Fibrillation and Ablation Therapy During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this